Back to articles

The room that closes deals: Why M&A firms are measuring marketing at the wrong moment

by Alya Amany Yasin

The mergers and acquisitions (M&A) firms most active, most present at conferences, most consistent on LinkedIn, and most diligent with webinars are not always the ones with the strongest pipeline. The numbers firms chase look impressive: More activity, more impressions, more registrants. Yet the correlation with deal flow remains weaker than most firms want to admit. The problem is not the format. It is the moment being measured.

In deal rooms, experienced advisors understand something that takes years to internalise: a finding does not need to be large to be decisive. A single liability surfaced during due diligence weeks after initial valuation, long after the relationship was established is enough to restructure terms, shift leverage, and redirect the entire outcome of a transaction. Scale does not determine impact. Relevance to the moment does.

The same principle governs how firms build presence in the market, and almost no firm is applying it deliberately. Most marketing investment in M&A advisory is evaluated at the moment of exposure: impressions after a campaign, registrants after a webinar, engagement after a post. These are real numbers. However, they are simply measurements of the wrong moment. The decision to call a firm does not happen at a conference booth or at the end of a content series. It happens later – often months later – in a private moment when a principal realises a deal is real and reaches for a name. That moment is quiet. It leaves no data trail.

In M&A, mandates are rarely awarded at first exposure. Clients engage advisors when a triggering event occurs a succession decision, an unsolicited offer, a shareholder dispute, a strategic review. The gap between first interaction and a mandate can span years. The challenge is therefore not visibility alone, but remaining cognitively available when those events emerge.

What gets measured shapes what gets built. Firms that track impressions invest in visibility volume, frequency, reach. Firms that understand recall invest differently. They produce content specific enough to signal genuine expertise, not mere familiarity. They take positions distinct enough to be associated with a particular kind of problem. The gap between these two approaches is not a question of budget. It is a question of what the firm believes marketing is actually doing.

Reaching the right principal is not a distribution problem – it is a specificity problem. An owner who attended a succession planning seminar two years ago may not remember the presentation. But when an unexpected acquisition approach arrives, the advisor associated with that discussion often becomes the first call. Specificity is what creates association. Association is what creates recall. And recall, at the moment a deal becomes real, is what creates the call.

The question is not whether to invest in better content or bigger events. The question is simpler and harder: when the right principal, facing the right deal, reaches for the phone, is this the firm that comes to mind? And if not, what was published last month that would have changed that?


At Protemus Capital, Alya Amany Yasin is part of the Business Development & Marketing team, overseeing PR strategy and social media presence while collaborating with stakeholders to strengthen brand visibility. She is passionate about digital storytelling and brand communication. 

about 19 hours ago

Protemus Capital